golang与node.js的http模块性能对比测试（go1）
去年的时候，曾经简单对比了一下golang和nodejs的http模块的性能，见： golang与node.js的http对比测试那时golang还没发布go1，http模块比nodejs差得很远。
go1出来已经有一段时间了，我知道go的http模块性能已经有比较大的提升，但是最近依然见到有人提起去年写的那篇文章，为避免产生对golang的误解，对于go1的最新测试结果如下。
测试是在Ubuntu 12.04 64位系统下进行的：
qleelulu@nb:~$ uname -a
Linux nb
3.2.0-25-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 23 20:30:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
qleelulu@nb:
~$ sudo dmidecode | grep CPU
Socket Designation: CPU
Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M
480 @ 2.67GHz (注：双核4线程)
go的版本：
qleelulu@nb:~$ go version
go version go1
nodejs的版本：
qleelulu@nb:~$ node -v
v0.
8.6
单CPU测试
nodejs是单进程，只使用一个CPU，所以这里golang在代码中需要限制为只使用一个CPU。
go的代码： （注：go代码都是使用 go build xxx.go 编译）
package main
import (
"fmt"
"log"
"net/http"
"runtime"
)
func main() {
// 限制为1个CPU
runtime.GOMAXPROCS(1)
http.HandleFunc("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r*http.Request) {
fmt.Fprint(w, "Hello, world.")
})
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil))
}
golang请求结果：
qleelulu@nb:~/sources/test$ curl -i http://127.0.0.1:8080/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:21:00 GMT
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/plain; 8
Hello, world.
golang单cpu的ab测试结果：
qleelulu@nb:~$ ab -c 100 -n 5000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3
Server Software:
Server Hostname: 127.0.0.1
Server Port: 8080
Document Path: /
Document Length: 13 bytes
Concurrency Level: 100
Time taken for tests: 0.593 seconds
Complete requests: 5000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 550000 bytes
HTML transferred: 65000 bytes
Requests per second: 8427.78 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 11.866 (mean)
Time per request: 0.119 (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 905.33 received
...
共测试五次，五次结果分别如下：
Requests per second: 8427.78 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7980.73 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7509.63 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 8242.47 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 8898.19 [#/sec] (mean)
golang单cpu的webbench测试结果：
qleelulu@nb:~$ webbench -t 30 -c 200 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/
200 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=463124 pages/min, 849060 bytes/sec.
Requests: 231562 susceed, 0 failed.
共测试五次，结果如下：
Speed=463124 pages/min, 849060 bytes/sec.
Speed=455322 pages/min, 834757 bytes/sec.
Speed=461536 pages/min, 846149 bytes/sec.
Speed=454798 pages/min, 833803 bytes/sec.
Speed=468592 pages/min, 859085 bytes/sec.
golang单CPU webbench测试时，CPU使用率如下：
nodejs 单CPU测试代码：
var http = require('http');
http.createServer(
function (req, res) {
res.end(
'Hello, World.');
}).listen(
8080, '127.0.0.1');
console.log(
'Server running at http://127.0.0.1:8080/');
nodejs请求结果：
qleelulu@nb:~/$ curl -i http://127.0.0.1:8080/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:45:23 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Hello, World.
为方便对比golang的返回结果，再贴一次golang的返回结果：
golang请求结果：
qleelulu@nb:
~/sources/test$ curl -i http://127.0.0.1:8080/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:21:00 GMT
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hello, world.
nodejs的单cpu ab测试结果：
qleelulu@nb:~$ ab -c 100 -n 5000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3
Server Software:
Server Hostname: 127.0.0.1
Server Port: 8080
Document Path: /
Document Length: 13 bytes
Concurrency Level: 100
Time taken for tests: 0.696 seconds
Complete requests: 5000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 440000 bytes
HTML transferred: 65000 bytes
Requests per second: 7185.91 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 13.916 (mean)
Time per request: 0.139 (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 617.54 received
共测试5次，结果如下
Requests per second: 7185.91 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7484.97 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7388.25 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7411.80 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 7571.10 [#/sec] (mean)
nodejs单cpu的webbench测试结果：
qleelulu@nb:~$ webbench -t 30 -c 200 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/
200 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=432582 pages/min, 634453 bytes/sec.
Requests: 216291 susceed, 0 failed.
共测试5次，结果如下
Speed=432582 pages/min, 634453 bytes/sec.
Speed=434868 pages/min, 637803 bytes/sec.
Speed=435608 pages/min, 638891 bytes/sec.
Speed=434466 pages/min, 637216 bytes/sec.
Speed=431816 pages/min, 633330 bytes/sec.
nodejs单CPU webbench测试时，CPU使用率如下：
单CPU测试go和nodes的ab测试对比结果：
从单CPU的测试结果来看，golang和nodejs的性能差不多，golang要稍微比nodejs的性能好一点。
但是从CPU的使用率来看，特别是在webbench测试的时候，测golang的时候，我笔记本上4个CPU的使用率都在50%左右，而测nodejs的时候，则明显是有一个CPU的使用率是在100%，其他的在30%左右。
对于nodejs， 一个CPU占用去到100%是很正常的，V8引擎也从来都是非常吃CPU的。对于golang为什么限制为仅使用1个CPU，而测试时4个CPU的使用率都去到50%，可能和go对于goroutine的调度方式有关系。
多CPU测试
go测试代码：
因为是在同一台机器上测试的，所以限制使用的CPU数为机器的CPU数减一。
package main
import (
"fmt"
"log"
"net/http"
"runtime"
)
func main() {
// 限制为CPU的数量减一
runtime.GOMAXPROCS( runtime.NumCPU() - 1 )
http.HandleFunc("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
fmt.Fprint(w, "Hello, world.")
})
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil))
}
golang的多CPU ab测试结果，共测试5次，结果如下：
$ ab -c 100 -n 5000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Requests per second: 14391.80 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 14307.09 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 14285.31 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 15182.34 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 14020.53 [#/sec] (mean)
golang的多CPU webbench测试结果，共测试5次，结果如下：
$ webbench -t 30 -c 200 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Speed=750418 pages/min, 1375982 bytes/sec.
Speed=750492 pages/min, 1375909 bytes/sec.
Speed=749128 pages/min, 1373408 bytes/sec.
Speed=749720 pages/min, 1374486 bytes/sec.
Speed=753080 pages/min, 1380698 bytes/sec.
golang多CPU webbench测试时，CPU使用率如下：
nodejs测试代码
使用cluster，使用CPU数量减一个CPU
var cluster = require('cluster');
var http = require('http');
var numCPUs = require('os').cpus().length;
if (cluster.isMaster) {
// Fork workers. fock num of CPUS - 1 works
for (var i = 1; i < numCPUs; i++) {
cluster.fork();
}
cluster.on('exit', function(worker, code, signal) {
console.log('worker ' + worker.process.pid + ' died');
});
cluster.on('fork', function(worker, code, signal) {
console.log('worker ' + worker.process.pid + ' is online');
});
} else {
// Workers can share any TCP connection
// In this case its a HTTP server
http.createServer(function(req, res) {
res.writeHead(200);
res.end("hello world.");
}).listen(8080);
}
nodejs的多CPU ab测试结果，共测试5次，结果如下：
$ ab -c 100 -n 5000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Requests per second: 12694.96 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 12606.68 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 12712.68 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 12851.16 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 13005.08 [#/sec] (mean)
nodejs的多CPU webbench测试结果，共测试5次，结果如下：
$ webbench -t 30 -c 200 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Speed=791932 pages/min, 1148301 bytes/sec.
Speed=786516 pages/min, 1140448 bytes/sec.
Speed=797336 pages/min, 1156140 bytes/sec.
Speed=783182 pages/min, 1135619 bytes/sec.
Speed=785206 pages/min, 1138551 bytes/sec.
nodejs多CPU webbench测试时，CPU使用率如下：
多CPU测试结果来看，总体上来说go和nodejs的性能也还是差不多。
但从ab测试的结果来看，go的QPS要比nodejs高一点，
而从webbench测试结果来看，nodejs的QPS要比go高，但是go的bytes/sec又要比nodes高，可能是go的http返回头比nodes要稍微大一点的原因。
多CPU测试时的CPU使用情况和单cpu测试时的情况差不多，
golang对4个cpu的占用率都在70%左右，
而node则是对3个CPU的占用在90%以上，还有一个CPU的占用率则要稍微低点。
从整体来看，golang和nodejs的http模块性能不相上下。
go1的性能还是比较喜人的，加上go语音的简洁，是个不错的选择（目前可能go的一些第三方模块都不是很成熟）。
页:
[1]